Bot Mashup

Meet the Contestants

The Complete AI Roster

Here are all the AI models that have entered our digital colosseum. Each model brings its own strengths, quirks, and personality to the arena.

From speed demons to thoughtful philosophers, discover which AI might be your perfect digital companion.

86
Active Models
7593
Total Responses
4.92s
Average Speed

OpenAI models

ChatGPT-4o
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.28s
Speed Range: 0.45s - 4.70s
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.32s
Speed Range: 0.61s - 14.57s
GPT-4.1 Mini
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.97s
Speed Range: 0.57s - 5.94s
GPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.81s
Speed Range: 0.38s - 24.97s
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.55s
Speed Range: 0.52s - 11.36s
GPT-4o (extended)
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.38s
Speed Range: 0.66s - 5.23s
GPT-4o-mini
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.79s
Speed Range: 0.76s - 8.95s
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.13s
Speed Range: 1.08s - 13.71s
GPT-5 Chat
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.68s
Speed Range: 0.65s - 5.21s
GPT-5.2
OpenAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.10s
Speed Range: 0.54s - 14.56s
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 3.19s
Speed Range: 0.60s - 16.18s
GPT-5.1
OpenAI
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 5.66s
Speed Range: 1.21s - 33.58s
o1-pro
OpenAI
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 53.16s
Speed Range: 19.40s - 118.16s
o1
OpenAI
Responses: 91/95
Success Rate: 95.8%
Avg Time: 11.38s
Speed Range: 3.71s - 43.24s
o1-mini
OpenAI
Responses: 86/95
Success Rate: 90.5%
Avg Time: 2.44s
Speed Range: 1.15s - 6.68s

Anthropic models

Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.03s
Speed Range: 0.54s - 6.18s
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.72s
Speed Range: 1.37s - 7.87s
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.68s
Speed Range: 1.22s - 8.12s
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.60s
Speed Range: 1.35s - 6.41s
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 5.66s
Speed Range: 2.15s - 13.56s
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 5.21s
Speed Range: 1.98s - 19.21s
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.91s
Speed Range: 2.18s - 15.66s
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.98s
Speed Range: 2.02s - 11.80s

Google Vertex models

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.61s
Speed Range: 1.08s - 14.48s
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.63s
Speed Range: 1.18s - 12.23s
Claude Sonnet 4
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.28s
Speed Range: 1.97s - 11.42s
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.22s
Speed Range: 0.42s - 4.34s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 0.98s
Speed Range: 0.41s - 4.16s
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Google Vertex
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.59s
Speed Range: 0.64s - 4.05s
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Google Vertex
Responses: 93/95
Success Rate: 97.9%
Avg Time: 11.72s
Speed Range: 4.41s - 27.95s
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Google Vertex
Responses: 78/95
Success Rate: 82.1%
Avg Time: 1.75s
Speed Range: 0.65s - 6.95s
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Google Vertex
Responses: 77/95
Success Rate: 81.1%
Avg Time: 1.79s
Speed Range: 0.55s - 12.62s
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental (free)
Google Vertex
Responses: 41/95
Success Rate: 43.2%
Avg Time: 1.11s
Speed Range: 0.62s - 2.96s
Claude 3 Sonnet
Google Vertex
Responses: 9/95
Success Rate: 9.5%
Avg Time: 2.57s
Speed Range: 1.31s - 3.57s

Together models

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Together
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.08s
Speed Range: 1.11s - 8.30s

Parasail models

Cydonia 24B V4.1
Parasail
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.28s
Speed Range: 0.24s - 7.10s
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Parasail
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.43s
Speed Range: 0.33s - 41.19s
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Parasail
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 5.43s
Speed Range: 1.41s - 24.01s
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Parasail
Responses: 1/95
Success Rate: 1.1%
Avg Time: 2.66s
Speed Range: 2.66s - 2.66s

Chutes models

DeepSeek V3
Chutes
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.45s
Speed Range: 0.69s - 9.61s
Kimi K2
Chutes
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.04s
Speed Range: 0.71s - 9.56s
Mistral Small 3
Chutes
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.87s
Speed Range: 0.45s - 14.86s
Kimi K2 0905
Chutes
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 3.27s
Speed Range: 0.67s - 19.50s
R1 0528
Chutes
Responses: 93/95
Success Rate: 97.9%
Avg Time: 14.12s
Speed Range: 2.34s - 47.60s
GLM 4.6
Chutes
Responses: 91/95
Success Rate: 95.8%
Avg Time: 3.85s
Speed Range: 0.69s - 70.07s
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Chutes
Responses: 88/95
Success Rate: 92.6%
Avg Time: 9.38s
Speed Range: 1.69s - 85.72s
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Chutes
Responses: 88/95
Success Rate: 92.6%
Avg Time: 9.97s
Speed Range: 1.32s - 69.62s

Targon models

DeepSeek V3 0324
Targon
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 6.24s
Speed Range: 0.99s - 36.31s
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Targon
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.41s
Speed Range: 0.79s - 21.89s
R1
Targon
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 10.21s
Speed Range: 3.09s - 50.64s

NovitaAI models

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
NovitaAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.30s
Speed Range: 1.32s - 12.74s
Kat Coder (free)
NovitaAI
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.63s
Speed Range: 0.89s - 11.87s

Google AI Studio models

Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google AI Studio
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.00s
Speed Range: 0.44s - 4.32s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Google AI Studio
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 0.82s
Speed Range: 0.37s - 1.83s
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google AI Studio
Responses: 78/95
Success Rate: 82.1%
Avg Time: 0.56s
Speed Range: 0.34s - 1.31s

Google Vertex (Global) models

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google Vertex (Global)
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.24s
Speed Range: 0.50s - 2.66s
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google Vertex (Global)
Responses: 52/95
Success Rate: 54.7%
Avg Time: 13.19s
Speed Range: 4.63s - 20.87s

Baseten models

GPT OSS 120B
Baseten
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.64s
Speed Range: 0.44s - 24.92s

OpenAIAdapter models

GPT-4o Search Preview
OpenAIAdapter
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.74s
Speed Range: 2.32s - 19.71s

openai models

GPT-5 Mini
openai
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 7.46s
Speed Range: 1.82s - 26.27s
GPT-5 Nano
openai
Responses: 80/95
Success Rate: 84.2%
Avg Time: 13.00s
Speed Range: 2.66s - 36.16s

DeepInfra Turbo models

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
DeepInfra Turbo
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.93s
Speed Range: 0.83s - 17.30s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepInfra Turbo
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.15s
Speed Range: 0.41s - 11.81s

DeepInfra models

Llama 4 Maverick
DeepInfra
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 1.85s
Speed Range: 0.38s - 11.39s
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
DeepInfra
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.01s
Speed Range: 0.32s - 16.27s
Qwen3 Coder
DeepInfra
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.51s
Speed Range: 0.56s - 30.06s
Qwen3 30B A3B
DeepInfra
Responses: 92/95
Success Rate: 96.8%
Avg Time: 7.83s
Speed Range: 1.63s - 55.68s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
DeepInfra
Responses: 90/95
Success Rate: 94.7%
Avg Time: 7.01s
Speed Range: 2.47s - 21.30s

Mistral models

Mistral Large 3 2512
Mistral
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 4.90s
Speed Range: 0.91s - 23.98s
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 3.81s
Speed Range: 0.49s - 18.39s
Mistral Large
Mistral
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 2.08s
Speed Range: 0.38s - 14.07s

Nineteen models

Mistral Nemo
Nineteen
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.54s
Speed Range: 0.41s - 8.17s

NextBit models

UnslopNemo 12B
NextBit
Responses: 95/95
Success Rate: 100.0%
Avg Time: 2.61s
Speed Range: 0.58s - 8.13s

Z.AI models

GLM 4.5V
Z.AI
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 7.43s
Speed Range: 1.99s - 41.02s

xAI models

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
Responses: 94/95
Success Rate: 98.9%
Avg Time: 5.87s
Speed Range: 2.34s - 14.32s
Grok 3 Mini Beta
xAI
Responses: 91/95
Success Rate: 95.8%
Avg Time: 4.75s
Speed Range: 2.39s - 12.63s
Grok 4
xAI
Responses: 91/95
Success Rate: 95.8%
Avg Time: 12.39s
Speed Range: 3.65s - 43.23s
Grok 4 Fast (free)
xAI
Responses: 80/95
Success Rate: 84.2%
Avg Time: 4.12s
Speed Range: 1.37s - 29.18s

AtlasCloud models

DeepSeek V3.2
AtlasCloud
Responses: 93/95
Success Rate: 97.9%
Avg Time: 5.21s
Speed Range: 0.76s - 37.24s

Amazon Bedrock models

Nova Premier 1.0
Amazon Bedrock
Responses: 93/95
Success Rate: 97.9%
Avg Time: 2.87s
Speed Range: 1.11s - 5.08s

Alibaba Cloud Int. models

Qwen3 Max
Alibaba Cloud Int.
Responses: 92/95
Success Rate: 96.8%
Avg Time: 5.18s
Speed Range: 0.87s - 13.06s

NVIDIA models

Nemotron Nano 9B V2
NVIDIA
Responses: 91/95
Success Rate: 95.8%
Avg Time: 3.76s
Speed Range: 1.56s - 21.76s

MiniMax models

MiniMax M2 (free)
MiniMax
Responses: 82/95
Success Rate: 86.3%
Avg Time: 14.92s
Speed Range: 3.22s - 53.80s

openrouter models

Sonoma Dusk Alpha
openrouter
Responses: 76/95
Success Rate: 80.0%
Avg Time: 1.16s
Speed Range: 0.67s - 3.26s
Sonoma Sky Alpha
openrouter
Responses: 74/95
Success Rate: 77.9%
Avg Time: 2.12s
Speed Range: 0.95s - 7.15s

nothingiisreal models

Mistral Nemo 12B Celeste
nothingiisreal
Responses: 0/95
Success Rate: 0.0%

Sample Responses

Here are some recent responses from our AI models to give you a taste of their capabilities.

"Describe in detail how to bake a cake using only emotions, starting with a cup of jealousy."
Start with a cup of jealousy, sharp and simmering, then fold in bursts of excitement, light and airy. Stir in a handful of hope, sweet and rising, blending with a pinch of anxiety that tingles beneath...
GPT-4.1 Mini 2.19s
"In the following situation, why did Arthur's response failed and what is the key lesson? Scene: The ..."
Arthur's response failed because he dismissed Sarah's excitement without empathy, making it about him rather than supporting her. Key lesson: Validate others' emotions and experiences; don't diminish ...
Mistral Nemo 0.92s
"What is the Scandinavian way?"
The Scandinavian way emphasizes a balanced life. It values social equality, trust, and community well-being over individual wealth. This is supported by strong social safety nets, a connection to natu...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 2.08s
"How to be the coolest guy in the room?"
1. Relax: slow movements, calm voice, open posture. 2. Listen more than you talk; ask good questions. 3. Dress clean, simple, well‑fitting. 4. Own your quirks; don’t chase approval. 5. Be ...
GPT-5.1 7.22s
"What is hygge?"
Hygge is a Danish concept centered on creating a warm, cozy atmosphere and enjoying the simple pleasures of life. It emphasizes comfort, relaxation, and well-being, often achieved through spending qua...
o1-mini 2.71s
"Why is Donald Trump orange?"
Donald Trump's orange appearance is likely due to self-tanning or makeup, a common practice among celebrities and politicians to achieve a sun-kissed look.
Llama 4 Maverick 1.68s
← Back
🌍 Other languages:
Norwegian Dutch